BOQ Builder·Auto-BOQ from dimensions, DSR ratesNEW→BidEasy·Government tenders, searchableLIVE→InfraLens App·Free on Play Store, offline-readyNEW→
PMCβ€ΊπŸ“ Design Coordinationβ€ΊClash Detection Report

Clash Detection Report

report
PMC-DES-RPT-001Β·v1.0-beta·⚠ Beta β€” review before use

Comprehensive report from clash detection runs using BIM software (Navisworks, Revit, etc.). Documents clashes by discipline pairs, severity, location, and resolution path.

ReferencesISO 19650 (BIM Process)Project BIM Execution PlanDiscipline-specific Design Codes (IS 456, IS 800, etc.)
Download
πŸ“ When to use this template
  • After each clash detection run (typically before GFC).
  • Coordination meeting input.
  • Design completion + handover documentation.
  • Forensic / claim resolution if construction issues arise.
Sections & fields
Preview of the template structure. Download Excel to fill on site.
1Run Header6 fields
Run Date
_____________
Software + Version
_____________
Models Run (Architecture, Structure, MEP, etc.)
_____________
Tolerance Settings
_____________
BIM Manager
_____________
Approval (PMC / Client)
_____________
2Clash Summary6 fields
Discipline Pair (e.g., HVAC vs Structure)
_____________
Total Clashes
_____________
Critical (Life Safety / Code)
_____________
Major (Coordination)
_____________
Minor (Cosmetic)
_____________
Resolved (% This Run)
_____________
3Critical Clashes Detail7 fields
Clash ID
_____________
Description + Location
_____________
Disciplines Affected
_____________
Impact
_____________
Resolution Owner
_____________
Target Date
_____________
Image / Screenshot Reference
_____________
4Trend3 fields
Total Clashes (per run, historical)
_____________
Closure Rate per Cycle
_____________
Time to Resolution (avg)
_____________
πŸ’‘ Sample filled excerpt
Run 14-May-2026 (Navisworks). Architectural Γ— Structure: 23 (3 critical). MEP Γ— Structure: 18 (1 critical). MEP Γ— MEP: 9. Total: 50 (5 critical). Avg resolution: 6 days. Trend: Run 3 of 5; 75 % resolved cumulatively.
βš– Compliance notes
  • Critical clashes must be resolved before GFC issuance.
  • Per ISO 19650, the BEP defines acceptance criteria + closure thresholds.
  • Clash count alone is misleading β€” severity classification is essential.
  • Document any deferred / accepted clashes (with engineering justification).

Engineer's Notes β€” Clash Detection Report

Why Clash Detection matters

Modern buildings have complex MEP systems β€” HVAC ducts, plumbing pipes, fire-sprinkler lines, electrical conduits, structural beams, lighting, BMS cabling β€” all sharing the same overhead space. Without 3D coordination, these systems clash at construction: a duct hits a beam, a pipe runs through a structural column, a sprinkler line interferes with a return-air grille.

In 2D design, ~5-15% of MEP runs have unidentified clashes. Resolving them on site costs 5-20Γ— more than resolving in design β€” site rework, demolition, re-routing, lost productivity, schedule slip. The Clash Detection Report is the formal output of BIM-based coordination (typically using Autodesk Navisworks or BIM360 / equivalent) that finds + classifies these clashes BEFORE construction.

For high-rise / commercial / institutional projects, clash detection has become standard practice. ISO 19650 (the international BIM standard, adopted as IS standard for India) explicitly requires clash coordination during the design phase.

How to use it on a project

Workflow: 1. Federated BIM model assembled from architectural + structural + MEP + plumbing + fire-safety disciplines 2. Clash detection run using Navisworks (or equivalent) β€” software identifies geometric collisions 3. Initial output typically has 500-5000 clashes (depending on project size + design maturity) 4. Triage: classify as Critical (must resolve), Major (resolve), Minor (cosmetic / acceptable), False (modelling artefact) 5. Resolution meetings: relevant designers + PMC + contractor work through Critical + Major clashes 6. Updated models + re-run cycle until Critical + Major count is < threshold (typically 0-5) 7. Sign-off: PMC + design team approve the federated model for construction 8. Pre-construction review: contractor's site team reviews resolved model before any installation

Report structure captures: - Clash ID + location (level + grid + element refs) - Clash type (e.g., HVAC duct vs structural beam) - Severity classification - Suggested resolution - Assigned designer - Status (open / in-progress / closed) - Final resolution + date

Tools commonly used: Autodesk Navisworks Manage, BIM 360 Coordinate, Solibri Model Checker, Trimble Connect.

Common pitfalls

1. Clash detection done too late β€” running it 80% through detailed design means significant rework. Best practice: clash detection cycles starting in concept design (initial coordination), repeating at preliminary + detailed milestones.

2. Disconnected models β€” designers working on different versions of the federated model. Use a Common Data Environment (CDE) per ISO 19650; single source of truth.

3. Designer non-attendance at resolution meetings β€” leads to one-sided 'resolutions' that come back to bite during construction. PMC must enforce attendance.

4. False clashes ignored without justification β€” minor modelling artefacts (e.g., a sprinkler head touching a ceiling tile in geometry) are dismissed without documentation. Future questions can't be answered.

5. No tolerance settings β€” running clash detection with zero tolerance gives thousands of trivial clashes. Set tolerance ~25-50 mm for general MEP; tighter (10 mm) for critical clearances.

6. Resolutions not propagated to construction drawings β€” model updated but 2D issue drawings not regenerated. Contractor builds to outdated 2D drawings.

7. No contract clause for clash detection β€” without contractual obligation, designers can argue 'not in scope'. PMC contract + design-team agreement must include BIM + clash detection.

Cross-references

Companion PMC formats: - Design Review Register (PMC-DES-REG-001) β€” broader design review including clash review meetings - BIM Coordination Log (PMC-DES-LOG-001) β€” running log of BIM-related coordination decisions - Drawing Transmittal (PMC-DES-FRM-001) β€” formal release of updated documents - RFI Review (PMC-MTG-MOM-012) β€” clarifications during construction (often arise from missed clashes)

Standards / methods: - ISO 19650 Parts 1-5 β€” BIM information management standard (adopted as IS standards) - IS 16711 Part 1:2017 β€” Building Information Modelling (BIM) β€” Information Management Standard - PAS 1192-2:2013 β€” Specification for information management during the capital / delivery phase (older British standard, referenced widely) - IS 17827 β€” BIM-related upcoming standard (under BIS CED 30 development)

For project specification: include 'BIM-based clash detection coordination' explicitly in the design consultant scope; specify deliverable (federated model, clash report, resolution log).

More related