IS 2309:1989 is the Indian Standard (BIS) for protection of buildings and structures from lightning. This standard provides guidelines for the design, installation, testing, and maintenance of lightning protection systems to safeguard buildings and structures against direct lightning strokes.
Recommendations for the design, installation, and maintenance of lightning protection systems for buildings and structures, often referenced alongside newer standards.
Down-conductor, earthing and bonding key requirements.
| Reference | Value | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Down conductors | Minimum 2, distributed | Down conductors |
| Earth termination resistance | ≤ 10 Ω (whole installation) | Earthing |
| Air termination method | Protective-angle / cone of protection | Air termination |
| Equipotential bonding | All metalwork bonded (prevent side-flash) | Bonding |
| Natural conductors | Rebar usable if proven continuous | Cl. |
| Maintenance | Periodic earth-resistance / joint test | Maintenance |
| Trigger | NBC 2016 Part 8 Sec 2 risk assessment | NBC |
BIM-relevant code. See the BIM Hub for ISO 19650, IFC, and LOD/LOIN frameworks used alongside it.
IS 2309:1989 is the code of practice for the protection of buildings and structures against lightning. It is invoked through NBC 2016 Part 8 Section 2, which makes lightning protection a design requirement for risk-prone structures: tall buildings, chimneys and towers, structures with explosives/flammables, hospitals and public buildings, structures housing electronics/data, and isolated tall structures in high-isokeraunic regions.
It is read with:
IS 2309 builds protection from three coordinated parts:
Reinforcement and structural steel may be used as 'natural' down conductors if electrically continuous. Equipotential bonding of all metalwork is essential to prevent side-flash.
Step 1 — is protection required? IS 2309 gives a weighted index from the structure's *use and contents*, *type of construction*, *height/isolation*, and the *local thunderstorm-day level*. Score each factor, combine to an overall risk index, and compare against the threshold: e.g., a 40 m RCC office with electronics in a 40-thunderstorm-day region scores above the threshold ⇒ protection required.
Step 2 — air termination: roof grid/finials so every point lies within the protective zone for the chosen height of air terminal.
Step 3 — down conductors: for a building of perimeter ≈ 120 m with the IS 2309 spacing rule for a 40 m structure (closer spacing with height), provide on the order of 6 down conductors evenly distributed (never fewer than two), each with a test joint ~ 2 m above ground.
Step 4 — earthing: an earth electrode per down conductor, all interconnected, system resistance ≤ 10 Ω, bonded to the electrical earth.
1. A single down conductor. Minimum is two, distributed; one conductor gives high impedance and no redundancy and is a frequent audit failure.
2. Earth resistance > 10 Ω / un-bonded earths. A separate, un-bonded lightning earth at a different potential causes side-flash into the building services during a strike.
3. Protecting the structure but not the electronics. IS 2309's classical system protects the *fabric*; sensitive equipment also needs surge protection (SPDs) and bonding — design for both, ideally via IEC 62305.
4. Not using the rebar as a natural conductor (or assuming it without proving continuity). Either provide dedicated conductors or *prove* electrical continuity of the reinforcement — don't assume it.
5. No maintenance/test regime. Joints corrode and earths drift; without periodic resistance testing the system silently degrades.
IS 2309:1989 is conceptually dated relative to IS/IEC 62305, which introduced lightning-protection levels (LPL I–IV), the rolling-sphere placement method, and an integrated approach to surge protection of internal systems. In current practice many consultants assess risk and design to IEC 62305 and use IS 2309 as the locally-referenced code for NBC compliance — documenting the basis in the design report. That is acceptable and usually superior.
The drivers today are data centres, hospitals, tall residential and renewable installations, where the real exposure is not the building burning down but equipment damage from the strike's electromagnetic pulse — which classical IS 2309 barely addresses. Treat IS 2309 as the minimum structural-protection baseline and layer IEC 62305-style surge/bonding design on top for any electronics-critical facility.
| Parameter | IS Value | International | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Risk Assessment Method | Prescriptive points-based system to determine need for LPS. | Quantitative risk analysis to determine the required Lightning Protection Level (LPL I-IV). | IEC 62305-2 |
| Air-Termination Design Method | Primarily uses the 'Cone of Protection' method with a 45° angle for structures up to 20m. | Primarily uses the 'Rolling Sphere Method' with radii dependent on LPL (20m for LPL I, up to 60m for LPL IV). | IEC 62305-3 |
| Typical Down-Conductor Spacing | Maximum spacing of 30m, with additional conductors based on ground area. | Average spacing is determined by LPL: 10m (LPL I/II), 15m (LPL III), 20m (LPL IV). | IEC 62305-3 |
| Roof Conductor Mesh Size | Recommends a grid of 10m x 20m. | Maximum mesh size is determined by LPL: 5x5m (LPL I), 10x10m (LPL II), 15x15m (LPL III), 20x20m (LPL IV). | IEC 62305-3 |
| Minimum Earth Resistance | The combined resistance of the earthing system should ideally not exceed 10 Ohms. | A value below 10 Ohms is recommended, but the primary requirement focuses on minimum electrode length (e.g., 5m) and configuration (Type A/B). | IEC 62305-3 |
| Min. Cross-Section (Copper Conductor) | 50 mm² (e.g., 20mm x 2.5mm tape). | 50 mm² (minimum thickness 2mm for tape). | IEC 62305-3 |