IS 10790:2000 (Part 2) is the Indian Standard (BIS) for methods of sampling of steel for prestressed and reinforced concrete, part 2: reinforcing steel. This standard specifies the methods for sampling reinforcing steel from a given lot or batch for conducting quality control tests. It defines the lot size, the number of samples to be drawn based on the lot size, and the acceptance criteria for the lot based on test results. It is the primary standard used for quality assurance of reinforcement steel at manufacturing plants and construction sites.
Methods of sampling of steel for prestressed and reinforced concrete, Part 2: Reinforcing steel
Key reference values — verify against the current code edition / project specification.
| Reference | Value | Clause |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Representative sampling of RCC reinforcement bars | Scope |
| Lot | One size/grade/cast/source | Procedure |
| Sample | Across the consignment — not a convenient bundle | Critical |
| Test | Strength (IS 1608) AND bend/re-bend (IS 1599) | Critical |
| Judge | The LOT vs IS 1786 for the grade | Rule |
| Ongoing | Per-consignment (sub-grade slips in otherwise) | Caution |
| Vs Part 1 | Part 2 = reinforcing (Part 1 = prestressing) | Cross-ref |
IS 10790 Part 2:2000 is the method of sampling of reinforcing steel for reinforced concrete — how a *representative* sample of reinforcement bars is drawn from a consignment so the IS 1786 strength/ductility acceptance (IS 1608 tensile, IS 1599 bend/re-bend) actually describes the lot. It is the reinforcing-steel companion to Part 1 (prestressing steel).
It sits in the reinforcement stack:
Reinforcement steel varies by cast, size and source, and bar substitution/sub-grade supply is a real risk on site. The acceptance only protects the structure if the sample is representative:
The engineering point: rebar acceptance disputes (low yield, failed bend, wrong grade, under-section/under-mass) very often unwind not to the mill but to the sample — a few convenient bars, an undefined lot. Reinforcement is the tension capacity of every RCC member; a non-representative sample certifies the bars you happened to grab, not the steel going into the structure.
Scenario: an HSD bar consignment for RCC.
Step 1 — define lots: group by size/grade/cast/source; split the consignment into lots per IS 10790 Part 2.
Step 2 — sample representatively: the standard number of bars from across the lot — not a convenient bundle.
Step 3 — test: tensile (yield/UTS/elongation, IS 1608) and bend/re-bend (IS 1599) — strength *and* ductility; also check mass-per-metre/section.
Step 4 — judge the lot: against IS 1786 for the grade; accept/reject the lot on the valid result.
Step 5 — control thereafter: keep sampling by consignment — a later sub-grade delivery is invisible without it.
Representative sampling makes the IS 1786 acceptance meaningful; a convenience sample certifies the grabbed bars, not the reinforcement in the structure.
1. Convenience sampling. A few grabbed bars don't represent the lot — the acceptance certifies nothing.
2. No lot definition. Mixed casts/sizes treated as one 'lot' breaks the statistics.
3. Testing only strength. Acceptance is strength and bend/re-bend ductility (IS 1599) — both per IS 1786.
4. One-time sampling. Later sub-grade/under-mass deliveries slip in without per-consignment sampling.
5. Confusing it with Part 1. Part 2 = reinforcing steel; Part 1 = prestressing steel (higher criticality).
IS 10790 Part 2 is reaffirmed and underpins reinforcement acceptance — and reinforcement is the tension capacity of every RCC member, with sub-grade supply, under-mass bars and wrong-grade deliveries being real, recurring site risks. As with all sampling standards the lesson is blunt: a IS 1786 acceptance only protects the structure if the sample genuinely represents the lot, and disputed low-yield / failed-bend / under-section results very often unwind to the *sample* (a convenient bundle, an undefined lot), not the mill. Define lots, sample across the consignment, test strength and bend/re-bend ductility together, judge the lot, and keep sampling per consignment so a later sub-grade delivery can't slip in. Don't confuse it with the higher-criticality Part 1 for prestressing steel — but apply the same discipline: witness the sampling, or 'representative' means 'whatever was easy to reach'.
| Parameter | IS Value | International | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sampling Frequency (Mass Basis) | One sample per 25 tonnes or part thereof from the same cast. | One series of tests per 'test unit', which is typically defined as a mass not exceeding 30-40 tonnes in product standards. | EN 10138-3 (referencing ISO 15630-3) |
| Sample Discard Length from Coil End | A length of at least 3 m shall be discarded. | At least 1 m of material from each end of a coil shall be discarded. | AS/NZS 4672.2:2007 |
| Primary Scope | Methods of sampling. | Test methods (which includes sampling). | ISO 15630-3:2019 |
| Lot/Batch Definition for Sampling | Based on number of coils to be selected from a larger lot (e.g. select 3 from a lot of 16-50 coils). | Based on a 'test unit' of a defined maximum mass from a single cast; every test unit is tested. | ISO 15630-3 / EN 10138-3 |
| Tensile Test Piece Free Length (Strand) | Not specified; refers to test method standard IS 1521. | The free length between the grips shall be at least 600 mm. | ISO 15630-3:2019 |
| Reference to Test Methods | Refers to other IS codes for specific test procedures (e.g., IS 1521 for tensile tests). | Contains the detailed test procedures directly within the standard itself. | ASTM A370-23 |